AI should accelerate review, not erase it
The most dangerous extraction error is not a typo. It is a wrong service date, wrong asset, or non-invoice classified as a real maintenance event.
Steward's product standard is reviewable extraction with confidence and source context.
Check the fields that change future behavior
Service date, asset, and category affect timelines and reminders. Those fields deserve more attention than invoice number or memo details.
If the invoice recommends follow-up, that should be reviewed before the schedule changes.
Keep rejected documents useful
Quotes, contracts, photos, and signatures should not become maintenance events. Rejection reasons help improve future triage and preserve the raw source if needed.
The system should make correction easy, not make the owner fight the model.