Automation should accelerate review, not erase it
The most dangerous reading error is not a typo. It is a wrong service date, wrong asset, or non-invoice classified as real maintenance work.
Steward's product standard is owner review with clear checks and original invoice context.
Check the fields that change future behavior
Service date, asset, and category affect timelines and reminders. Those fields deserve more attention than invoice number or memo details.
If the invoice recommends follow-up, that should be reviewed before the schedule changes.
Keep rejected documents useful
Quotes, contracts, photos, and signatures should not become maintenance visits. Rejection reasons help preserve the original file if needed.
The system should make correction easy, not make the owner fight the model.